But as said, there is a good working combination and I left the idea that Affimity will get such.īut none of this is explicitly requested by the OP - not even the development of RAW files. I think, also because the raw editor is not even touched since years, Affinity has no interest in this. Ok, C1 is not cheap, but you get a professional tool which is also in Ipad now and which has excelent thetering for studio work.įor me this is an golden combination C1 and Affinity and I have to see if Affinity is able to get on that level. This interactions works perfect and is comparable to the Adobe Light room- photoshop integration. Want to edit again in Affinity, no problem, edit the tiff again and edits will be incooporated. Tiff layers are stored again in C1 and you can contine in C1. I t converts to tiff opens Affinity and you can edit in Affimity. That's fine, but once in Capture one, adjustments and opions for selection, masking, layers etc are all possible, the tool is super fast and editing in Affinity works perfect. Sending a file in Brigde to Affinity not really promoted, In lightroom file management is a hassle and both are serious slow in performance compared to DXO and C1.ĭXO has an excellent raw convertor and noise reduction, but all works witu U points. Lightroom & bridge are real hassles wrt file management. I worked with DXO, Capute one and Light room. My suggestion would be to first start with some Raw convertor like found in Adobe Photoschop before building a tool like bridge or even better like capture one or Lightroom. If you compare the Raw conversion with Capture One, DXO, Nikon Studio NX and Adobe Light-room / Bridge, than you know what I mean. Until today, any image like those are still not working. I sent in some examples including the raw files, but never got feedback. I've the complete suite from Affinity since the early stages, but also complained a long time ago about incorrect Raw and color conversions. Therefore I also do not see somthing like bridge.Īfffinity is miles behind Raw convertors, like Capture One, DXO, Nikon Studio NX and Adobe Light-room / Bridge The coversion and options are far of what is should be. With all respect to Affinity, I really love to work with Affinity tools, but I don't use it to import my raw files. Like all of us here.: can't wait to see the Affinity Bridge!!!! It's FREEWARE - be sure to donate if you can. Mac users: "For showing/previewing Affinity files the option "Show all graphic formats" should be checked (XnView Preferences → General) PC users: "For showing/previewing Affinity files the option "Show all graphic formats" should be checked (Tools → Settings. Eagle, Pixave - now vaporware, Neofinder ($40)- very close, but, oddly, doesn't auto-update catalogs, though w/more expensive 'Business' version ($150 for 2 seats), one can set to update on schedule (by days or weeks -) Having spent hours trying different Adobe Bridge alternatives: e.g. I'll never make it to the other end of all it can do. Like doing GPS, accepting Photoshop plugins, running AppleScripts, Facial Recognition, and hundreds more things I have not even gotten to yet. GC is really a Swiss Army Knife image app. Well beyond a " bitmap editor", It just happens to be called a " converter" because it does that exceptionaly well. It is how I catalog and access my 300,000 digital photos going back 25+years. GraphicConverter is a robust and talented File Browser and digital asset manager. And if so, I'd simply add a small "Docname. Since I'm using it mostly for working with standard bitmap type of images, I'm not all that in need to see the corresponding Affinity docs, if any. SInce I still continue working in El Capitan, with no plans to change that anytime soon, they will pry my iView/Expression Media from my cold, dead hands! There's something in its workflow that I need and that still no other app can match. (GC user since mid-1990s, CDF/NF user since 2000) They both work just fine side by side, with some overlapping functionality which is all right by me. Whereas Graphic Converter – as the name hints – has always focused on editing bitmap files. Neo Finder has a different purpose: Its main focus is to catalog media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |